cast.Make a video · Free

Can AI-generated videos be copyrighted?

In the US, a video generated purely from a prompt is not protected by copyright: the Copyright Office says prompts alone do not give enough human control to make you the author[3]. What you add yourself, such as your own footage, script, edits, and the selection and arrangement of AI clips, can be protected[5].

This page is general information, not legal advice. It covers the US position as published by the Copyright Office; other countries can differ, and a lawyer should answer anything that depends on your facts.

What the US Copyright Office says

The Copyright Office published Part 2 of its Copyright and Artificial Intelligence report, on whether AI outputs can be copyrighted, on January 29, 2025[1]. Its conclusions are the clearest official guidance on AI video in the US:

What that means for a typical AI video

How the report's principles map onto common ways people make AI video. A guide to the reasoning, not a ruling.
What you didLikely position under the report
Typed a prompt and posted the clip as it came outThe footage itself is likely not protected, because the prompt alone does not make you the author[3].
Wrote a script, then generated clips for itYour script is your own writing. The generated pictures are still AI output[4].
Cut many clips into a sequence with your own timing and orderThe selection and arrangement can be protected; the individual clips still are not[5].
Painted over, re-animated or composited the output by handYour perceptible modifications can be protected[5].
Mixed AI shots with your own camera footageYour own footage is protected as usual; the AI shots are judged separately[6].

In practice, the more of the finished video you shaped by hand, the stronger your claim. A single unedited 10-second clip is the weakest case. A short film you scripted, cut, timed, scored and colour-graded yourself is a much stronger one, even if every shot came from a model.

Copyright works the other way too

Not being able to own the output is one question. Infringing someone else's work is another. Only a copyright owner may make or authorise adaptations of their work, and an unauthorised adaptation may be infringement[7]. A video of a famous franchise character can be an adaptation of that character whether you drew it or a model did. In our renders, video models also blocked franchise names and props; we cover what gets blocked in why Seedance blocks videos.

Using AI output commercially is a separate question again, governed mostly by the tool's terms; see can I use AI videos commercially.

How to strengthen your claim

  1. Keep your script, storyboard and edit project files. They show what you decided.
  2. Write your own dialogue and voice-over rather than asking the model for it.
  3. Edit: choose takes, cut them to your timing and order, add your own sound and titles.
  4. Design original characters instead of imitating existing ones. Our character consistency guide shows how we keep an original character stable across videos.
  5. Do not claim the purely AI-generated parts as your own work; they are not protected[4]. Claim what you made.

Where Cast fits

Where it does not:

People also ask

Do I own a video I made with an AI tool?
You may have rights under the tool's terms, but in the US the raw output is not protected by copyright if you only wrote the prompt[3]. Your own edits, script and arrangement are what you can own[5].
Does a very detailed prompt count as authorship?
Not under the Copyright Office's current view. It concluded prompts alone do not give enough control over the output with today's generally available tools[3].
Does editing an AI video make it copyrightable?
Your edits can be. Creative selection, arrangement or modification of AI outputs can be protected, though the AI-made parts themselves are not, and each case is judged on its facts[6].
Can someone reuse my unedited AI clip?
If the clip has no protectable human contribution, copyright gives you little to enforce[4]. Platform rules on reposting and the tool's terms may still apply.
Is AI fan art of a famous character legal?
No official source we found addresses AI fan art directly. The general rule is that only the copyright owner may authorise adaptations of a work[7].

Sources

Claims about other companies come from their own pages, read on the date shown. Products and prices change; check the link for the current version.

  1. US Copyright Office: Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (read )
  2. US Copyright Office: NewsNet on the Part 2 report (read )
  3. US Copyright Office: Copyright and AI, Part 2: Copyrightability (PDF) (read )
  4. US Copyright Office: Part 2 report, purely AI-generated material (read )
  5. US Copyright Office: Part 2 report, human contributions (read )
  6. US Copyright Office: Part 2 report, case-by-case analysis (read )
  7. US Copyright Office: Circular 14, Copyright in Derivative Works (read )

Related answers

Part of the Cast answers library (Copyright, rules and safety).

Updated